Cites 8 docs - [ View All ]. The appellant submitted that complete and correct information has not been provided to him by the respondents. The threat of penalties under the RTI Act and the pressure of the authorities under the RTI Act should not lead to employees of a public authorities prioritising 'information furnishing', at the cost of their normal and regular duties. The respondents submitted that available information has already been provided to the appellant as per his RTI application. A beneficent Statute, when made a tool for mischief and abuse must be checked in accordance with law.
| Uploader: | Akinogrel |
| Date Added: | 8 June 2006 |
| File Size: | 48.30 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 6300 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
Nor should it be converted into a tool of oppression or intimidation of honest admmit striving to do their duty. Special Leave Petition Civil No.
The Commission has also heard various appeals of the appellant in File Nos. Aditya Bandopadhyay and Orswherein it was held as under:.
Career For Govt Job: RRC Bilaspur Group D Results Group D Exam Result
Similarly, the High Court of Bombay in Dr. Free for one month and pay only if you like it. Furthermore, a reference can also be made vard the relevant extract of Section 2 j of the RTI Actwhich reads as under:. The replies given by the respondents were seen during the hearing, which was found to be satisfactory.
RRC Bilaspur Group D Results 2014 www.rrcbilaspur.org Group D Exam Result
The appellant requested the Commission to direct the respondent to provide complete information to him. Secr/0/32012 Act should not be allowed to be misused or abused, to become a tool to obstruct the national development and integration, or to destroy the peace, tranquillity and harmony among its citizens. His candidature was rejected due to non- submission of self declaration of non-creamy layer status in prescribed format along with his application form. The respondents submitted that available information has already been provided to the appellant as per his RTI application.
The respondent further submitted that the RTI afmit of the appellant stem from his grievance resulting from rejection of carv candidature and do not have any relation to any larger public interest. Railways, Railway Recruitment Cell, Bilaspur seeking information on five points, including, inter-alia: The appellant participated in the hearing through video-conferencing.
Administrative Officer and Ors.
South East Central Railway Recruitment Apply for vacancy
The respondents submitted their written submissions dated The appellant and the respondents agreed for adjudication of all three cases together, as the subject-matter is identical in nature. The threat of penalties under the RTI Act and the pressure of the ssecr/03/2012 under the RTI Act should not lead to employees of a public authorities prioritising 'information furnishing', at the cost of their normal and regular duties.
The Commission, after hearing the submissions of all the parties and after perusal of records, observes that available information has already been provided to the appellant sec/r03/2012 per his RTI application.
A beneficent Statute, when made a tool for mischief and abuse must be checked in accordance with law. Even eight cases including the present one are listed today for hearing viz.
The Commission observed that in Admot Sahni Vs. Try out our Premium Member services: Aditya Bandopadhyay8 SCCthe Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held that, "Indiscriminate and impractical demands or directions under RTI Act for disclosure of all and sundry information unrelated to transparency and accountability in the functioning of public authorities and eradication of corruption would be counter-productive as it will adversely affect the efficiency of the administration and result in the executive getting bogged down with the non- productive work of collecting and furnishing information.
The respondents further apprised the Commission that the appellant has appeared in the written examination and his candidature was rejected in the subsequent stages of the recruitment.
The appellant submitted that complete and correct information has not been provided to him by the respondents. Chief Mechanical Engineer, Sh. Cites 8 docs - [ View All axmit. One RTI suffices for such purposes.
No comments:
Post a Comment